![Senate Fails to Move Forward with Contraception Protection Legislation 2 20230713T1215 OTC BIRTH CONTROL 1762386 1024x576 1](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/20230713T1215-OTC-BIRTH-CONTROL-1762386-1024x576-1.jpg?w=1170)
The United States Senate faced a consequential vote on June 5 regarding the Right to Contraception Act aimed at safeguarding nationwide contraception access, which ultimately did not achieve the required support for further consideration.
Attempting to move the bill forward, the procedural motion received a vote of 51-39, an insufficient number for overcoming the Senate’s filibuster-proof threshold of 60 votes. Demonstrating a strategic move, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., a proponent of the measure, purposely voted against the advancement, allowing for the possibility of reintroducing the bill at a later time.
Specifically, the Right to Contraception Act intends to enshrine the right to obtain a range of contraceptives, including birth control pills and IUDs, as well as sterilization procedures such as vasectomies, into federal law.
In a pre-vote statement, Schumer refuted claims by skeptics who argue that the threat to abortion and religious liberty is inherent in the legislation, maintaining that neither concern is relevant to the bill.
“If you think women should universally have access to contraception, you should be in favor of this legislation,” Schumer noted. “That’s the bottom line.”
Conversely, Senate Minority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., labeled the vote a “show vote” doomed to fail, accusing Democrats of camouflaging an effort aimed at supporting Planned Parenthood and eliminating conscience protections for healthcare providers under the pretext of ensuring contraceptive access—which according to him is not at risk.
Despite opposition, public polls consistently demonstrate a strong backing for contraceptive access among Americans. Moreover, Democrats have attempted to link the importance of contraceptives to the restricted availability of abortion services, particularly in an election year. The Catholic Church takes a stance against artificial birth control methods while supporting naturally-based fertility awareness options.
Addressing the topic, former President Trump clarified his platform after an initial comment that seemed to hint at the possibility of restrictions, affirming subsequently his stance against a ban on contraceptives, a stance he claims is shared by the GOP.
Before the vote, GOP Senate candidates received counsel from the National Republican Senatorial Committee, suggesting they vocalize support for contraceptive access.
A collective of Republican senators, led by Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., criticized the bill for its alleged infringement upon parental and religious rights rather than opposing contraception itself.
The vote also spawned local demonstrations, including a display by Americans for Contribution of a giant IUD inflatable near Capitol Hill to show support for the bill.
The National Catholic Bioethics Center, offering guidance on Church teachings including contraception, states that while its use to prevent procreation is not condoned, utilizing contraception for treatment of diseases is permissible when the prevention of procreation is not the intentional outcome.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church distinguishes between morally objectionable contraception and the acceptance of fertility-based awareness methods, the latter aligning with Church-approved moral standards.
- Reported by Kate Scanlon, a national reporter for OSV News covering Washington-related stories. Follow her on X (formerly known as Twitter) @kgscanlon.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
-
What is the Right to Contraception Act?
The Right to Contraception Act is a legislative proposal designed to codify the right to access contraceptives, including various birth control methods and sterilization procedures, on a federal level.
-
Why did the vote fail to advance the Right to Contraception Act in the Senate?
The procedural vote failed to achieve the 60-vote threshold necessary to overcome a filibuster in the Senate, only securing a 51-39 outcome.
-
What reasons did opponents of the bill state for their decision?
Opponents, such as Senate Minority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., argued that the bill was a political distraction, misrepresenting the state of contraceptive access and seeking to eliminate protective measures for healthcare providers who object on religious or moral grounds.
-
What is the Catholic Church’s stance on contraception?
The Catholic Church is against artificial contraception methods but supports natural methods based on fertility awareness that align with moral teachings.
-
Will there be another opportunity for the Right to Contraception Act to be voted on?
As Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer strategically voted against advancing the bill to preserve the right to reintroduce it, there may be future opportunities for the bill to be considered again in the Senate.