Richard Simmons Sets the Record Straight: No Permission Granted for Biopic

image 1 1

Former fitness icon Richard Simmons has raised concerns over an upcoming biopic in which comedian and actor Pauly Shore is set to portray him. In a rare statement, Simmons emphasized that he has not given permission for the movie and urged people not to believe everything they read. The as-yet-unnamed biopic was announced by Pauly Shore, who gained attention due to his physical resemblance to Simmons, sparking a viral meme.

Simmons, now 75, rose to fame in the 1980s with his energetic and eccentric persona, promoting health and fitness through talk show appearances and his successful Sweatin’ to the Oldies aerobics videos. However, in recent years, Simmons has withdrawn from public life, choosing a more private and quiet existence. His disappearance became the focus of a 2017 podcast titled “Missing Richard Simmons,” which aimed to unravel the mystery behind his retreat from the public eye. Simmons later clarified that he simply valued his privacy, while critics questioned the ethics of the podcast.

The biopic, reported to be developed as a “dramatic and heartfelt feature in the tone of Little Miss Sunshine,” is under the production of the Wolper Organisation, a subsidiary of Warner Bros. While Simmons has expressed his disapproval, the production company remains committed to honoring and celebrating his life, ensuring that the movie tells a dramatic story while respecting his privacy.

Simmons took to Facebook to address the news, stating, “I have never given my permission for this movie. So don’t believe everything you read. I no longer have a manager, and I no longer have a publicist. I just try to live a quiet life and be peaceful. Thank you for all your love and support.” His message reflects a desire for tranquility and hints at the challenges he has faced in maintaining a private life.

The biopic’s announcement by Pauly Shore, who claims to be playing Simmons, adds another layer of complexity. Shore acknowledged the public’s reactions to his role and mentioned attempting to contact Simmons, noting that they’ve been playing “phone tag.” Despite Simmons’ explicit disapproval, Shore expressed optimism about making the biopic happen, suggesting a potential clash of interests between the public’s curiosity and Simmons’ desire for privacy.

The Wolper Organisation responded to Simmons’ statement, acknowledging his deep privacy concerns. While expressing a desire to have Simmons involved, they affirmed their commitment to producing a movie that recognizes and celebrates the significant impact he has had on millions of lives. The production company intends to tell a dramatic story that respects Simmons’ privacy, acknowledging the delicate balance between recognizing his achievements and allowing him to maintain his chosen level of seclusion.

This situation raises questions about the ethical considerations of creating biopics about living individuals, especially those who have retreated from the public eye. While such projects may be driven by admiration and the desire to pay tribute, the subjects’ explicit disapproval highlights the challenges of navigating between public fascination and individual privacy.

As the biopic continues to develop, it remains to be seen how Simmons and those involved in the project will reconcile these conflicting interests. The delicate task of telling Simmons’ story while respecting his privacy underscores the complex relationship between public figures and their personal lives, especially when their narratives are intertwined with their public personas.

Read More: Doja Cat’s Brother Accused of Severe Abuse and Dental Damage

Richard Simmons Sets the Record Straight: No Permission Granted for Biopic 2
Exit mobile version