Johnny Depp has lost his defamation body of evidence against the Sun paper over an article that considered him a “undershirt”.
Mr Depp, 57, sued the paper after attacked his ex Amber Heard, which he denies. The Sun said the articleJudge Mr Justice Nicol said the Sun was in the article to be “generously obvious”. of abusive behavior at home had happened.
Mr Depp’s attorney called the decision “unreasonable” and said the Hollywood entertainer plans.
A representative for the Sun said it had supported quite a long time,Heard for the court”. heard more than 16 days in July at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.
Ms Heard’s legal counselor in the US, Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, said “not an astonishment”.
“Very soon, we will introduce much more the US,” she said.
Mr Depp is suing Ms Heard, 34, in the US in a she wrote in the Washington Post. Mr Depp says the article suggested he was brutal towards her.
‘Depp made Heard dread forever’
The charges the period somewhere in 2013 and 2016, when
The appointed authority featured three episodes where he said Mr Depp had placed Ms Heard her life”.
In one of those occurrences, in Australia in 2015, Mr Depp was obnoxiously injurious towards her while Mr Depp blamed Ms Heard his appointed authority said he Heard was capable.
“Taking all the proof together, I acknowledge that she was continued by Mr Depp in Australia,” said Mr Justice Nicol.
It is his fury that spray painting in blood from that was lacking, dunking his in paint and different things,” the appointed authority said. the idea of the attacks he submitted against her.
Heard ‘not a gold-digger’
Of the of aggressive behavior at home, there were two the appointed authority didn’t happened.
They were a supposed episode in December 2014, which the appointed authority said he was “not convinced? comprised an actual attack”, and another in November 2015, which the appointed authority said couldn’t it was not put to Mr Depp in interrogation.
Mr Justice Nicol said that “a repetitive topic in Mr that Ms Heard had built a fabrication and that she had done protection strategy’,” and that Ms Heard was a “gold-digger”. may, he added: “I characterisation of Ms Heard.”
Talking outside court on the most recent day of July, Ms Heard said and she with her life”.
Jenny Afia of Schillings law office, who spoke to Mr Depp, stated: “This choice is stupefying.
“Most alarming is the adjudicator’s dependence on Amber Heard, and relating dismissal of counter-proof from hand, other unchallenged observers and a variety of the imperfect to such it would be silly for Mr Depp not to bid this choice,” she added.
A representative for the Sun stated: never be hushed and we thank the adjudicator for his cautious thought and Heard for her boldness the court.”
Good cause Women’s Aid said each and the right to to and accepted”. to survivors who don’t fit the ‘awesome’ casualty – and paying little heed to the prominent of the supposed victimizer. There is no reason .