Introduction
Jenna Ortega’s recent comments about the upcoming season 2 of “Wednesday” have sparked discussions and concerns among fans regarding the potential increase in CGI. While the show garnered praise for its premiere season, criticisms of its CGI effects raised questions about the direction of the series. Ortega’s hints at a more action-packed season have fueled apprehensions about the CGI quality, especially considering the shortcomings observed in season 1. However, a comparison with Netflix’s successful series “Stranger Things” offers hope for improvement and a blueprint for navigating such concerns.
FAQ
What criticisms were raised about CGI in Wednesday season 1? Among the notable criticisms of Wednesday season 1 were concerns regarding the quality of CGI effects, particularly in depicting the Hyde monster and Enid’s werewolf. Viewers found fault with the contrast and unrealistic nature of the CGI, which detracted from the overall viewing experience.
How do Jenna Ortega’s comments about season 2’s action contribute to concerns about CGI?
Ortega’s remarks about season 2 being “bigger” and “more action-packed” have led to skepticism among fans, as increased action typically entails more extensive use of CGI. Given the criticisms of CGI in season 1, there are concerns that a similar approach in season 2 could exacerbate existing issues.
How does “Stranger Things” offer hope for addressing CGI concerns in Wednesday season 2?
“Stranger Things,” another popular Netflix series, successfully navigated similar challenges by progressively increasing its scale and budget with each season. By investing in better special effects and CGI, “Stranger Things” improved the quality of its action sequences and creature designs, providing a blueprint for Wednesday season 2 to enhance its CGI capabilities and address viewer concerns.