Revisiting The Devil Wears Prada: Miranda Wasn’t the True Villain

60db8dba36cf170019de89d9

The Devil Wears Prada

In the iconic film “The Devil Wears Prada,” based on Lauren Weisberger’s book, Miranda Priestly emerges as the central figure of disdain. Yet, upon reflection, one character stands out as even more detestable, especially with the passage of time: Andy’s boyfriend, Nate.

While Miranda’s demanding nature is evident, Meryl Streep’s portrayal added depth to her character, making her somewhat beloved despite her flaws. Audiences were drawn to hate her in a way that elevated the film’s allure. However, the portrayal of Andy’s friends, particularly Nate, left much to be desired.

In the film, Andy’s commitment to her job at Runway magazine strains her relationships, a narrative thread present in the book. However, while the book portrays Andy’s friends and boyfriend as understanding but distant, the film paints them in a much harsher light. Nate, in particular, is depicted as unsupportive and intolerant.

Nate’s character arc reflects a troubling dynamic that has only become more apparent over time. Initially, he embodies the notion of a “pick me” person, disapproving of Andy’s transformation into a fashion-conscious individual. His withdrawal of support as Andy embraces her career borders on misogyny, as he prefers her to remain “not like other girls.”

By the film’s end, Nate’s lack of support is seemingly validated as Andy chooses to prioritize their relationship over her job. However, this resolution only serves to highlight Nate’s intolerant stance.

While Miranda is far from blameless, she exhibits depth and complexity that mitigate her villainy. Her actions, while often self-serving, reflect a nuanced understanding of the fashion industry. In contrast, Nate’s character lacks redeeming qualities, making his misogyny all the more pronounced.

Revisiting The Devil Wears Prada: Miranda Wasn't the True Villain 2

FAQ

Who is the primary antagonist in “The Devil Wears Prada”?

While Miranda Priestly is often perceived as the main antagonist due to her demanding nature and formidable presence, the true villain of the story is Andy’s boyfriend, Nate.

What role does Nate play in the film?

Nate is portrayed as Andy’s supportive boyfriend at the beginning of the film. However, as Andy’s career at Runway magazine progresses, Nate becomes increasingly critical and unsupportive.

How does Nate’s character evolve throughout the film?

Initially, Nate embodies the “pick me” mentality, preferring Andy to remain aloof from the fashion industry. However, as Andy embraces her career and undergoes a transformation, Nate’s intolerance becomes more pronounced, ultimately leading to strains in their relationship.

Why is Nate considered the true villain of the story?

Nate’s lack of support for Andy’s career aspirations, coupled with his dismissive attitude towards her growth and development, paints him as the true antagonist. His intolerance and refusal to accept Andy’s evolving identity border on misogyny, making him a deeply flawed character.

How does Miranda Priestly compare to Nate as a villain?

While Miranda Priestly exhibits demanding and self-serving behavior, her character is nuanced and multifaceted. Despite her flaws, Miranda demonstrates respect and understanding for the fashion industry. In contrast, Nate lacks redeeming qualities, making his intolerance and lack of support all the more pronounced.

What lessons can be learned from the portrayal of Nate in “The Devil Wears Prada”?

Nate’s character serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of intolerance and the importance of supporting loved ones in their personal and professional growth. His unwillingness to accept Andy’s aspirations ultimately leads to the deterioration of their relationship, highlighting the detrimental effects of toxic masculinity.

As audiences revisit “The Devil Wears Prada,” it becomes evident that the true villain may not be who we initially perceived. Miranda Priestly’s ambition may be excessive, but Nate’s intolerance is unforgivable, casting him in the role of the film’s true antagonist.

Exit mobile version