![WWE Seeks Arbitration Over Allegations Made by Janel Grant 2 wwe logo phone getty 1 1](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/wwe-logo-phone-getty-1-1.jpg?w=1170)
In the ongoing legal battle, WWE firmly supports the request of Vince McMahon to move the Janel Grant lawsuit to arbitration.
Earlier this year, in January, Janel Grant took legal action against prominent WWE figures Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis, and the WWE organization itself, claiming she was subject to sexual assault and sex trafficking by McMahon and Laurinaitis. McMahon has publicly denied these serious accusations. Following the controversy, he stepped down from his roles at WWE and TKO, while also being subjected to a federal inquiry.
The wrestling giant has officially replied to Grant’s allegations through legal channels, backing McMahon’s appeal for the arbitration of the case. WWE filed a Memorandum of Law. Although not admitting to the accusations, the company insists that Grant’s agreement to arbitrate the claims forbids the court from intervening in the matter.
The corporation insists that Grant’s claims do not stand since she agreed to an arbitration clause within a separation and non-disclosure agreement she entered with WWE and McMahon, an agreement from which she has admittedly received and kept monetary compensation. The details were reported by John Pollock from POST Wrestling.
WWE references a non-disclosure pact signed by Grant in 2022 that obliges her to relinquish any legal claims or pursuit of litigation against McMahon or the WWE, which includes “a clear and unambiguous arbitration provision,” as noted by WWE.
The organization also rejects the assertion from Grant’s representatives that the non-disclosure agreement is invalidated by legislations such as the Speak Out Act and the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000.
As updates become available, WrestleZone is committed to providing further details on the case.
FAQ about WWE’s Motion to Compel Arbitration in Janel Grant Case
Q: What exactly is WWE requesting in regard to Janel Grant’s lawsuit?
A: WWE is requesting that Janel Grant’s lawsuit go to arbitration rather than being heard in court, as per the terms of the agreement she signed.
Q: Why does WWE believe this case should go to arbitration?
A: WWE refers to the non-disclosure and separation agreement that Janel Grant signed, which contains an arbitration clause. The company believes this clause makes court intervention inappropriate.
Q: What is the Speak Out Act, and why is it relevant to this case?
A: The Speak Out Act is legislation that protects individuals’ rights to speak out against sexual harassment and assault, even if they have signed an NDA. Grant’s side seems to argue that this invalidates the NDA, but WWE contests this interpretation.
Q: Has Vince McMahon admitted to any of the allegations made by Janel Grant?
A: No, Vince McMahon has denied all of Janel Grant’s allegations.
Q: What steps has McMahon taken after the allegations were surfaced?
A: McMahon resigned from his positions at WWE and TKO and is currently under federal investigation.
Conclusion
In response to the lawsuit initiated by Janel Grant, WWE has taken firm legal action, advocating for arbitration based on the agreement Grant signed. While WWE disputes the allegations, their stance is firmly rooted in the arbitration clause within the NDA. The law will ultimately determine the outcome of this motion, but it’s yet another chapter in the complex legal landscape of professional wrestling and workplace conduct. WrestleZone will continue to monitor the situation and report on any new developments in the ongoing legal battle.