Amber Heard Files Subpoena Against LAPD

Amber Heard

American actress Amber Heard, former wife of actor Johnny Depp, gestures as she gives a statement after the end of the trial outside the High Court in London, Tuesday, July 28, 2020. Hollywood actor Johnny Depp is suing News Group Newspapers over a story about his former wife Amber Heard, published in The Sun in 2018 which branded him a 'wife beater', a claim he denies. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)

Johnny Depp actually experienced victory in his defamation suit against Amber Heard when the last’s petition was pardoned by the judge. Regardless, Amber Heard has now given a subpoena in her case against the Los Angeles Police Department in the battle in court against her ex, Johnny Depp.

Johnny Depp had as of late recorded a defamation suit against Amber Heard for $50 Million. As she countersued, the trial is presently set for 2022. As per reports by Deadline, Amber’s legal move against the LAPD was confirmed by a clerk in Fairfax County that communicated Heard’s legitimate gathering is referencing the LAPD to “produce the books, documents, records, electronically stored information and tangible things” identifying with a 2016 domestic disturbance including her and her ex, Johnny Depp. It was moreover referred to that Heard’s legitimate instructors in like manner sent a subpoena in January at this point this time it was recorded to request body camera footage from officers who responded to Heard and Depp’s home.

Additionally, Heard is referencing the materials to learn if officers “followed LAPD policy, strategies just as protocols in responding to the call at Eastern Columbia Building on May 21, 2016, in regards to Ms. Heard”. She’s regardless, referencing for all documents and trades from the officers’ assessment including “all documents that show any deletions, changes or review up the present for footage moved during that time span”.

Johnny Depp had before given a statement uncovering how Hollywood was boycotting him after he lost his defamation lawsuit against The Sun when the outlet suggested him as a ‘undershirt.’ However, the British Court oversaw against Johnny Depp in his libel action against the owner of the paper. Value Nicol later gave a clarification that Depp had exhibited the crucial parts of his justification behind action in libel anyway the defendants had shown what they circulated in the significance which she held the words to bear what was essentially self-evident.

Exit mobile version