![Defamation Case in Court: YouTuber Who Allegedly Defamed Kang Daniel Conceals Identity While Attending Trial 2 youtuber thumbnail 270524](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/youtuber-thumbnail-270524.jpg?w=1170)
At the Seoul Central District Court’s Criminal Division 18 presided by Judge Lee Jun-gu on May 27th, the trial of YouTuber Park, accused of violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation), took place.
Donning a disguise composed of a wig, glasses, and a mask on top of a pink shirt and white skirt, YouTuber Park hid her visage when she made her court appearance. When inquired about her profession, she stated, “I run an online shopping mall.“
![Defamation Case in Court: YouTuber Who Allegedly Defamed Kang Daniel Conceals Identity While Attending Trial 3 youtuber](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/youtuber-1-270524-1.jpg?resize=600%2C400)
In the lawsuit, Park is accused of uploading videos about singer Kang Daniel on the channel “Sojang,” under provocative titles such as “The Promiscuous Private Life of an Actor and Idol, the Nation’s Boyfriend,” which were deemed by the prosecution as slanderous.
While Park’s defense conceded to the uploading of the videos, they disputed any intent to slander, assertively stating, “There was no intention to defame; Park believed the information to be true.“
Further examination by the court into whether Park was conscious of the falseness of the information was met with the defense declaring, “We couldn’t verify it. It’s the prosecution’s duty to prove the falsehood.“
![Defamation Case in Court: YouTuber Who Allegedly Defamed Kang Daniel Conceals Identity While Attending Trial 4 youtuber](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/youtuber-2-270524.jpg?resize=600%2C399)
Upon her exit from the courtroom, Dispatch probed Park with questions such as, “Why have you changed your name multiple times?,” “Why did you continue posting videos despite legal warnings from agencies?,” and “Did you buy a house with YouTube earnings?“
Park, masking her face with her wig, abstained from commenting, while her legal counsel interjected, “We will address these in the next hearing.“
The road ahead shows several more trial dates for Park. She is embroiled in a civil lawsuit with IVE’s Jang Wonyoung and Starship Entertainment. The first trial resulted in a win for Jang Wonyoung and her agency.
![Defamation Case in Court: YouTuber Who Allegedly Defamed Kang Daniel Conceals Identity While Attending Trial 5 youtuber](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/youtuber-3-270524.jpg?resize=600%2C400)
Although Park attempted an appeal and went through mediation in the second trial, it was unsuccessful, and the legal contests continue.
In addition to the civil case, Park is also confronted with criminal charges. The Incheon District Prosecutor’s Office has indicted her without detention on defamation and insult charges under the Information and Communications Network Act.
It is asserted that Park published 23 videos that supposedly maligned celebrities on the “Sojang” YouTube channel from October 2021 to June the following year.
Moreover, reports suggest that Park accrued over 250 million won earnings from such videos over a span of two years, which she purportedly invested in real estate, thus amassing wealth.
FAQs about the Defamation Case Involving YouTuber Park and Kang Daniel
- What are the charges against YouTuber Park?
Park is charged with defamation, violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, based on videos that were posted on the ‘Sojang’ channel, allegedly slandering Kang Daniel.
- Did Park admit to posting the videos?
Yes, Park’s legal team acknowledged the posting of the videos but denied any intent to defame, claiming that Park believed the information was true.
- What does Park say about the evidence against her?
Park’s defense stated that they were unable to verify the truthfulness of the information, suggesting that it is the prosecution’s responsibility to prove the videos were false.
- What is the status of the civil lawsuit with Jang Wonyoung?
Park has lost the initial trial against Jang Wonyoung and Starship Entertainment. An attempt at mediation in the second trial failed, and the court battles continue.
- Has Park been indicted on criminal charges?
Yes, the Incheon District Prosecutor’s Office has indicted Park without detention for charges of defamation and insult under the Information and Communications Network Act.
- How much has Park allegedly earned from the videos?
It is reported that Park earned over 250 million won from the videos in question over two years, using these funds to purchase real estate and build wealth.
Conclusion
The legal entanglements between YouTuber Park and various parties including Kang Daniel and Jang Wonyoung underscore the potential ramifications of defamatory content on social media. As the trials continue, the outcomes of both the civil and criminal cases will be pivotal in addressing issues related to online defamation and the responsibilities of content creators. The court proceedings and the actions of Park, from concealing her identity to the financial outcomes of her YouTube activities, will be closely watched by the public and legal professionals alike. The next hearings promise to provide further clarity into the veracity of Park’s actions and the legal precedents they may establish.