Rebuttal issued by ADOR on recent accusations.
![ADOR Challenges HYBE’s Interpretation of “Project 1945” Document Amidst Power Struggle Allegations 3 170 2024 04 24T231658.385 1](https://i0.wp.com/theubj.com/uae/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/170-2024-04-24T231658.385-1.jpg?resize=900%2C439)
HYBE had recently made claims about discovering a document signifying Min Hee Jin’s intentions of a coup involving “Project 1945.”
“Project 1945?” – Further Evidence By HYBE Surfaces Against Min Hee Jin Concerning Power Takeover Plan
The controversial document emerged during an audit and included details related to lawsuits, media strategy, and others. HYBE interpreted “Project 1945” as a metaphor for Min Hee Jin’s ambition to separate ADOR from the company, referring to the year 1945 being historically notable for Korea’s independence.
An ADOR representative refuted claims by speaking to Channel A Korea, asserting that the documents were minor notes, comparable to “personal doodles” without significant meaning. Moreover, they stated that HYBE was already privy to the “Project 1945” document before the audit concluded, challenging the narrative of its discovery by HYBE.
What was found were akin to personal doodles.… The ‘document’ in question was already in HYBE’s knowledge prior to the audit results.
— ADOR Representative
This development is the latest in a series of events following allegations that Min Hee Jin sought to encroach on ADOR’s management previously held by HYBE, causing HYBE to initiate an audit of her and ADOR’s management practices. Min Hee Jin has continuously denied such allegations, even amidst tension over accusations of HYBE allowing the replication of her intellectual property in relation to NewJeans. Additional details are available below.
Is Min Hee Jin Attempting to Secure NewJeans’ Independence from HYBE? — Analysis from Industry Experts
Share This Post
FAQs about HYBE and ADOR’s Conflict over “Project 1945”
- What is “Project 1945”?
“Project 1945” is the title of a document that HYBE alleges contains evidence of Min Hee Jin’s plans to take control of ADOR independently. The document includes points about lawsuits and media strategies.
- How does HYBE interpret “Project 1945”?
HYBE interprets “Project 1945” as an allusion to a plan by Min Hee Jin to establish ADOR’s independence, akin to South Korea’s historical year of liberation in 1945.
- What is ADOR’s response to the allegations?
ADOR has denied the allegations, stating that the document was more like personal notes without any concrete plans or the potential for realization.
- Has Min Hee Jin admitted to the allegations?
No, Min Hee Jin has denied the allegations of trying to usurp HYBE’s management rights to ADOR.
Conclusion
The ongoing dispute between HYBE and ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin continues with the latest development concerning the “Project 1945” document. As both parties maintain their positions, with HYBE asserting evidence of a coup and ADOR rejecting such claims, the industry and fans alike are left to speculate the ultimate outcome of this corporate confrontation. What is clear is that the revelations of the document and the subsequent denials have added another layer of complexity to the situation, with no clear resolution in sight.