In the ongoing legal tussle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt over their esteemed Chateau Miraval winery, a new development has emerged. Jolie, 48, has been legally compelled by the Los Angeles Superior Court to furnish all non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) she engaged in with third-party entities over the course of eight years, from 2014 to 2022.
This latest court ruling marks another setback for Jolie in the high-stakes battle over the winery, valued at approximately $350 million. The legal scrutiny over the NDAs is a result of Jolie’s claims that she withdrew from selling her share of the winery to Pitt, 60, terming his prerequisite for an “unconscionable” privacy agreement as part of the sale deal.
Credit: Getty
Judge Lia Martin has given Jolie 60 days to present the required documents, dismissing her assertions that the NDAs hold “no relevance” to the case. Pitt’s legal team insists that Jolie’s defense is weakened due to her own habitual use of NDAs. They allege her action of selling her share to Russian magnate Yuri Shefler in October 2021 was an attempt to “rationalize” her decision and contravened a mutual agreement with Pitt that any sale to a third party required mutual consent.
As part of their divorce negotiations, Jolie had also sought an NDA from Pitt, indicative, according to Pitt’s lawyers, of her “weaponizing” such agreements. Moreover, testimony from Jolie’s former bodyguard has spotlighted her stringent enforcement of NDAs, including a threat to sue those who breached their NDAs by providing evidence for Pitt in custody hearings.
FAQ Section
Q: What are Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie disputing over?
A: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are involved in a legal dispute over the sale of Jolie’s stake in their joint $350 million French winery, Chateau Miraval.
Q: What recent ruling has been made in this case?
A: The Los Angeles Superior Court has ruled that Angelina Jolie must hand over all NDAs she has agreed with third parties from 2014 to 2022.
Q: Why are NDAs significant to the winery dispute?
A: NDAs come into play as Jolie claimed she withdrew from selling her stake to Pitt due to an unreasonable privacy agreement he proposed. Pitt’s team argues that Jolie’s own use of NDAs undermines her defense.
Q: Has Jolie previously requested Pitt to sign an NDA?
A: Yes, during their divorce negotiations, Jolie requested Pitt to sign an NDA, which Pitt’s legal team cites as evidence of her using NDAs for self-serving purposes.
Q: What does Pitt’s legal team claim regarding Jolie’s sale to Yuri Shefler?
A: Pitt’s attorneys argue that Jolie’s sale to Shefler goes against an understanding they had, wherein they would not sell their shares to a third party without mutual agreement.
Conclusion
In the ongoing and intricate legal clash between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, the courts continue to unravel the myriad contractual and personal agreements that complicate their split. The latest ruling compels Jolie to divulge all non-disclosure agreements that might shed light on the couple’s dealings and her individual actions regarding the winery sale. The dispute is far from over, with both parties firmly standing their ground. This case exemplifies the complex intersections of business, personal relationships, and legal obligations, leaving the legal system as the ultimate arbiter of their protracted conflict over Chateau Miraval.