The behind-the-scenes saga of the “Halloween” franchise includes some peculiar anecdotes—especially regarding the sixth installment, “Halloween 6,” which is known for its two unique versions: the theatrical release and the lesser-known producer’s cut. Despite the completion of these films, neither version managed to captivate the audience outside of the hardcore fan base, and the story took an irreversible turn towards the occult with the Cult of Thorn, effectively closing the chapter on its continuity.
Continuing in the franchise’s convoluted history, Daniel Farrands had originally conceived a sequel to his version of “Halloween 6,” which was explored in “Taking Shape II.” His vision was compromised due to extensive rewrites that left key characters dead and disrupted the intended narrative arc, which included a surprise return of Laurie Strode. Nevertheless, franchise producer Moustapha Akkad moved to cut the direct sequel ties. Eventually, writer Robert Zappia was tasked with formulating a new direction for a potential “Halloween 7,” which was envisioned as a direct-to-video release featuring none of the original players, a different setting altogether, and the introduction of an additional killer.
The trajectory of the series took another turn when Jamie Lee Curtis expressed interest in returning for the franchise’s 20th anniversary. Curtis’s involvement ushered in a new team of writers, including “Scream” genius Kevin Williamson, who steered through treatments, WGA arbitration, resulting in “Halloween H20.” This installment surprisingly retained many elements from Zappia’s script, earning him credits for both the story and screenplay in the final film.
FAQ About Unproduced Halloween Sequels
- What were the two different versions of “Halloween 6”?
There were the theatrical release and the producer’s cut, which featured alternate content and a different ending. - Why didn’t Daniel Farrands’ sequel to “Halloween 6” happen?
Extensive rewrites to “Halloween 6” changed key plot points and character fates, making his intended sequel no longer feasible. - What was Robert Zappia’s vision for “Halloween 7”?
Zappia’s script was meant for a direct-to-video release with no returning characters from previous films, a new setting, and an additional killer. - How did Jamie Lee Curtis influence the direction of “Halloween H20”?
Her desire to return for the series’ anniversary resulted in new writers and a story that combined some of Zappia’s ideas with fresh elements. - Did Robert Zappia receive credit for his work on “Halloween H20”?
Yes, Zappia was credited for the story and screenplay even though many of his original ideas were altered.
Conclusion
The “Halloween” film series has experienced a turbulent journey with various twists, turns, and what-ifs that have intrigued and sometimes baffled its fanbase. The tale of these bizarre and unproduced sequels gives us a glimpse into the complexities of filmmaking and how creative visions can evolve or be discarded. Crucial decisions from producers, the input of original cast members like Jamie Lee Curtis, and the realities of the film industry have all played a part in shaping (and reshaping) the narrative of this iconic horror franchise. Ultimately, the Halloween series reminds us that even the most peculiar sequel ideas can influence the final product, even if they never fully materialize on screen.