In a recent turn of events in the legal battle involving Vince McMahon, Janel Grant has taken action against the wrestling magnate’s defense.
On April 23, Vince McMahon and his legal counsel submitted a motion seeking private arbitration in his legal battle with Janel Grant, who has brought forth allegations of sexual assault and sex trafficking against him. McMahon’s filings included a robust denial of Grant’s accusations. In response, Grant’s legal team quickly replied on April 24 with a motion to strike McMahon’s preliminary statement in the motion, which she found to be inflammatory and damaging to her reputation.
Grant’s filings criticized McMahon for using his preliminary statement as an attack on Grant’s character, describing it as a “transparent attempt to harass and intimidate” her. Grant and her attorneys, including the notable Ann Callis, want the court to eliminate McMahon’s initial response from the records and to reprimand McMahon and his attorneys in an appropriate manner.
In addition to the matters of personal conduct brought up by McMahon, Grant argues that these assertions have no relevance to the central issues of the lawsuit or the motion, which should focus on whether or not the case should be sent to arbitration. She emphasizes that such topics should not be included in legal arguments intended to address arbitration.
Vince McMahon, who resigned from his executive roles at WWE and TKO earlier this year amidst a federal investigation, has consistently denied all of Grant’s claims.
As the case continues to unfold, WrestleZone promises to deliver updated information when it is made available.
RELATED: Report: Vince McMahon Cooperating With Authorities, Has Not Had Settlement Talks In Janel Grant Lawsuit
FAQs About Janel Grant’s Motion Against Vince McMahon
- What is Janel Grant accusing Vince McMahon of?
Janel Grant is accusing Vince McMahon of sexual assault and sex trafficking. - What legal action did Vince McMahon take on April 23?
Vince McMahon filed a motion seeking to move the lawsuit to private arbitration and denied Grant’s accusations. - How did Janel Grant’s legal team respond to McMahon’s motion?
Grant’s legal team filed a motion to strike McMahon’s preliminary statement from the motion and requested the court to reprimand him and his lawyers. - Why does Janel Grant want the preliminary statement stricken?
Grant feels the statement contains attacks on her character, which she believes are meant to intimidate her and is irrelevant to the legal question of arbitration. - Has Vince McMahon admitted to any of the allegations?
No, Vince McMahon has denied all of Janel Grant’s claims.
Conclusion
In the ongoing legal proceedings between Janel Grant and Vince McMahon, Grant has challenged McMahon’s defense, specifically targeting his initial statement as an attempt to discredit her. Grant asserts that the comments about her character have no place in the legal discussions focusing on arbitration. The legal discourse sets an important precedent on how preliminary statements can be perceived as personal attacks rather than legal arguments. As the case develops, observers await further details and the court’s decisions on the motion to strike and possible admonishments.