Generative AI is a hotly debated topic these days. It involves computers that collect data from global sources to create text, movies, and images. The core of this discussion is comprised of numerous questions. Can production businesses use it as a means of making cost savings? Is the merchandise genuinely subpar? And, given the debate, why do CEOs appear so intent on using it? Producer Chris Miller recently answered the latter, which has been a major topic of controversy. In particular, he declared that “Beyond the Spider-Verse” will not use any generative AI.
This issue came into sharper focus after IndieWire reported on May 30 that Sony Pictures Entertainment CEO Tony Vinciquerra informed investors of the studio’s interest in producing films and television content more efficiently using AI. This statement naturally raised concerns, especially regarding movies like the third installment of the Spider-Verse series. These films are known for their stunning visuals, which are painstakingly crafted. The prospect of Sony using generative AI for the sake of efficiency worried many fans and industry professionals alike. In response to these concerns, Chris Miller made a clear stance on Twitter: “There is no generative AI in Beyond the Spider-Verse and there never will be. One of the main goals of the films is to create new visual styles that have never been seen in a studio CG film, not steal the generic plagiarized average of other artists’ work.”
It’s essential to recognize that while the Spider-Verse movies have utilized AI programs, they have not employed generative AI. Instead, they have integrated ethical and smart-use machine learning techniques to eliminate repetitive tasks and assist artists in adhering more accurately to 3D geometry. According to effects supervisor Pav Grochola, the team decided to use machine learning to enhance artists’ productivity by providing an initial predicted result that would give them a reasonable first pass at creating ink lines on the characters.
This distinction between ethical machine learning and generative AI is crucial. Machine learning, when used responsibly, can significantly aid artists by speeding up mundane tasks, allowing them to focus more on the creative aspects of their work. In contrast, generative AI often raises ethical concerns because it can undermine the efforts of numerous real humans and relies on the work of others without proper attribution or compensation. This difference is not just technical but ethical, affecting how content is produced and valued in the creative industries.
The concerns surrounding generative AI are not unfounded. Many fear that its use in film and TV could lead to a decline in the quality of content, as the unique touch of human creativity might be lost. Additionally, there are valid worries about the potential for job losses among artists and creators whose work could be replaced by AI-generated content. Despite these issues, some industry leaders see generative AI as a tool for achieving greater efficiency and cost savings.
However, as Chris Miller and others argue, the true value of films like those in the Spider-Verse series lies in their ability to push the boundaries of visual storytelling and create something genuinely new and original. By relying on generative AI, there is a risk of producing content that feels generic and uninspired, lacking the distinctiveness that human creativity brings. The debate over AI in the creative industries is far from over. Machine learning, when used appropriately, can be a powerful tool to help artists achieve their goals more quickly and efficiently. But generative AI, with its potential to devalue human effort and creativity, remains a contentious issue.
For now, it seems that at least some creators, like those behind the Spider-Verse films, are committed to preserving the integrity and uniqueness of their work by steering clear of generative AI. This commitment is evident in the Spider-Verse team’s approach to using technology. They leverage AI for repetitive tasks, not for creative ones. This approach helps maintain the human touch in their films, ensuring that each project retains its artistic integrity and originality.
The broader industry is watching these developments closely. As AI technology continues to evolve, the line between helpful tools and unethical shortcuts will be scrutinized. The ongoing discussion about AI in film and TV will likely influence other creative sectors as well, from music and literature to graphic design and beyond. The core of the debate is not just about efficiency or cost but about the essence of creativity itself. How do we balance technological advancements with the irreplaceable value of human creativity?
Kyle Anderson, the Senior Editor for Nerdist, and host of the weekly pop culture deep-dive podcast Laser Focus, has weighed in on this debate. Through his reviews and commentary, he highlights the ongoing tension between the technological advancements that can aid production and the need to maintain the human element that makes creative works truly special. This discussion is likely to continue as the industry grapples with finding the right balance between innovation and preserving the artistry that defines great filmmaking.
Although the direction AI will take in the creative industries is unclear, the Spider-Verse film series’ creators have set the standard. It’s an appeal to respect human ingenuity and see technology as an aid rather than a substitute. The industry needs to tread carefully in these waters, making sure that even as we adopt new technologies, we don’t lose sight of the fundamental elements that contribute to the human resonance of creative works. The future of all creative expression, including film and television, will be determined by this equilibrium.
If you like the article please follow on THE UBJ.