As Daylight Saving Time approaches once again, Missourians are voicing their opinions on the bi-annual clock change, with overwhelming support for putting an end to the ritual. However, the path forward is mired in disagreement, with differing preferences on whether to adopt permanent Daylight Saving Time or permanent Standard Time.
According to new polling conducted by St. Louis University and YouGov, 78% of likely Missouri voters are in favor of abandoning the practice of changing clocks twice a year. However, when it comes to choosing between permanent Daylight Saving Time or permanent Standard Time, opinions are sharply divided.
Of the survey respondents, 47% expressed a preference for permanent Daylight Saving Time, which would result in more daylight in the evening and less in the morning. Meanwhile, 31% favored permanent Standard Time, which would provide more daylight in the morning and less in the evening. Only 16% of respondents wished to maintain the status quo, while 6% remained undecided.
The issue of timekeeping has long been a topic of debate across the country, with proponents of each option citing various benefits and drawbacks. Jay Pea, a resident of Arizona – one of the few states that adheres to permanent Standard Time – shared his perspective on the matter.
Pea, who serves as the president of Save Standard Time, emphasized the logistical advantages of sticking to Standard Time year-round. He noted that Arizona residents appreciate the consistency and simplicity of not having to adjust their clocks twice a year.
Interestingly, Pea pointed out that the 1966 Uniform Time Act already allows states to make Standard Time permanent, making it a potentially easier path forward from a legal standpoint. Conversely, the pursuit of permanent Daylight Saving Time would likely present more significant legal challenges.
As Missourians grapple with the question of how to put an end to the bi-annual clock change, the debate continues to evolve, with advocates on both sides making their voices heard. Ultimately, the decision rests in the hands of policymakers, who must weigh the preferences of constituents against practical considerations and legal frameworks.
