Netflix‘s miniseries “Painkiller” dives into the harrowing tale of the launch of OxyContin and the subsequent opioid epidemic, but its heavy-handed style often overshadows the weighty narrative it aims to convey. While Adam McKay’s influence isn’t directly credited, the series bears the mark of his signature pacing, metaphors, and narration that grabs the audience‘s attention. Created by Micah Fitzerman-Blue and Noah Harper, “Painkiller” struggles to strike a balance between educating and entertaining, resulting in a frenetic experience that occasionally obscures its crucial subject matter.
The series opens with a powerful flourish, utilizing non-actors to read disclaimers about the show’s dramatized elements. These disclaimers are followed by individuals sharing stories and photographs of loved ones lost to the opioid crisis, serving as a visceral reminder of the real-life impact. This poignant approach sets the tone for the series, emphasizing the gravity of the opioid epidemic.
READ MORE: Exploring Dark History and Creating Safe Spaces: Reservation Dogs Director Danis Goulet Opens Up
At its core, “Painkiller” chronicles the rise of OxyContin and its devastating consequences. Richard Sackler (Matthew Broderick) introduces the revolutionary medication, propelling Purdue Pharma to immense wealth while inadvertently sparking an epidemic of addiction. The series pulls from real events and sources like Barry Meier’s “Pain Killer” and Patrick Radden Keefe’s New Yorker article, offering a haunting look at the pharmaceutical industry’s exploitation of regulatory gaps.
Despite its profound material, “Painkiller” falls into the trap of excess. Ambitious in its attempt to present multiple perspectives, it introduces characters like Shannon (West Duchovny) and Glen (Tyler Kitsch), who struggle to transcend their generic portrayals. Uzo Aduba‘s portrayal of Edie, a federal investigator entangled in the fight against Purdue Pharma, brings an authentic layer of emotion to the series. However, the heavy-handed dialogue and sequences tend to undermine the depth of character development.
As the series hops between fantasy sequences, rapid montages, and needle drops, it seems more intent on impressing than informing. While these stylistic choices are meant to underscore the urgency of the subject, they often distract from the narrative’s potency. The series tries to connect emotionally with viewers through jarring contrasts, like using “Psycho Killer” and “I Put a Spell on You” to underscore different themes.
While “Painkiller” effectively sheds light on the dark underbelly of the pharmaceutical industry, it struggles to maintain a cohesive balance between entertainment and education. The powerful message often gets lost in the cacophony of visual and auditory stimulants. While the series successfully exposes the methods behind Purdue Pharma’s manipulation, it falls short in providing nuanced character portrayals and a cohesive storytelling approach.
In an era where impactful documentaries like Hulu‘s “Dopesick” take a more somber yet persuasive approach to similar subject matter, “Painkiller” sacrifices depth for visual flair. While its core narrative is essential, the excessive style ultimately overwhelms the show’s potential impact. As viewers navigate the series’ flashy exterior, they may find themselves wishing for a more direct path to its heart and a clearer connection to its powerful message.