Amber Heard says wrong member of the jury sat in Johnny Depp maligning case, needs new preliminary

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard 1654683792988 1655382087919 360x180 1

Entertainer Amber Heard maintains that another preliminary should be requested, and malfeasance to be announced in her slander argument against ex Johnny Depp. Her legal counselors told a US court ‘fair treatment was compromised’ in the of the jury, who was not recorded for obligation, turned into a piece of the preliminary, and hence the court ought to excuse the June 1 decision. As of late, court excuse the maligning preliminary decision, saying there was no proof to back Johnny’s case that Amber slandered her.

Golden the jury in a Virginia court to pay Johnny $10 million in $5 million in the appointed authority brought down to $3.5 million due to a cap in the province of Virginia. Then again, Johnny Depp pay Amber $2 million following their The jury decided that Amber had maligned her ex in a 2018 article, in which she said she was a casualty of homegrown maltreatment.

Amber Heard says wrong member of the jury sat in Johnny Depp maligning case, needs new preliminary 2

As per another report, Amber’s legal counselors that the. Cutoff time covered Friday that a 77-year-old individual was called for seems to inhabit a similar 52-year-old, who had ‘a similar last name’. The last option was the hearer, seating on the jury all through the preliminary.

“Ms. Heard reserved by the Virginia Code, that the attendants in be people who were really brought for jury obligation. For this situation, apparently Juror No. 15 was not, truth be told, a similar the Consequently, the 52-year-old-(redacted) sitting on the jury for quite some time was never called for jury obligation on April 11 and didn’t ‘show up in mind,’ as required,” Amber’s legal counselors said in a to new  by Deadline.

Golden’s legal  because of the supposed mix-up, the ‘fair treatment’s had been ‘compromised’, and subsequently said that a court, which would ruin the its result.

“Ms. Heard’s fair treatment was accordingly compromised. Under these conditions, a malfeasance ought to be proclaimed, and another preliminary arranged,” Amber’s lawyer Elaine Bredehoft was cited to have said in the new report attorneys Johnny was were granted to him by the jury, saying, “There is harm to Mr. Depp’s standing brought about by Mrs. Heard’s Op-Ed.”

Johnny and Amber have both blamed each other for aggressive behavior at home. Johnny sued Amber for maligning in view of a commentary The Washington Post in 2018. She never referenced his name, yet she  note addressing homegrown maltreatment’. In 2021, Amber countersued Johnny for $100 million.

Exit mobile version