Within Arlington, Texas (AP) — It’s possible that robot umpires will make their regular-season debut in 2026 if Major League Baseball implements them as part of a challenge system during spring training next year.
Since 2019, minor league baseball has experimented with the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS). However, the system’s proper definition of the strike zone will require further development before it can be implemented at the major league level. During a discussion with the Baseball Writers’ Association of America, Commissioner Rob Manfred talked about the feasibility of implementing ABS in 2026, stressing the importance of a good trial run in spring training.
“ABS will not likely be introduced to the big leagues without undergoing a thorough spring training test,” Manfred explained. He underscored the importance of resolving technological and operational challenges to ensure the system’s readiness for Major League play.
Since its launch, Triple-A baseball parks have been used as testing grounds for ABS, exposing subtleties in the defining of strike zones and operational logistics. When strikes were first introduced, ABS used the point at which the ball left the plate—which was 8.5 inches from the front and rear boundaries—to determine strikes. The strike zone’s top boundary was raised from 51% to 53.5% of the batter’s height, while the lower boundary remained at 27%. This change was made because the system had to adapt to these changes.
Technical hurdles regarding the precise definition of the strike zone remain a focal point. Manfred acknowledged ongoing challenges in this regard, indicating that MLB is working diligently to address these issues before moving forward with full-scale implementation.
The preliminary findings of the Senate report authored by Senator Bernie Sanders have ignited renewed scrutiny of Amazon’s operations during its Prime Day sales events. The report, released on the first day of this year’s Prime Day, underscores the toll that peak shopping periods take on warehouse workers tasked with fulfilling customer orders at Amazon’s facilities nationwide.
Drawing from an extensive Senate committee investigation and internal company data spanning 2019 and 2020, the report highlights a disturbing trend: heightened injury rates among warehouse workers during Prime Day and other peak shopping seasons. These findings are corroborated by interviews with over 100 current and former Amazon employees, revealing a concerning pattern of workplace hazards exacerbated by high-demand periods.
Senator Sanders, a vocal critic of Amazon’s labor practices, condemned what he termed “incredibly dangerous working conditions” perpetuated by the e-commerce giant. He pointed to Amazon’s robust profitability—reportedly generating $36 billion in profits last year alone—and substantial executive compensations as stark contrasts to the hazardous conditions faced by its workforce. Sanders accused Amazon of prioritizing speed and productivity at the expense of employee safety, characterizing this approach as emblematic of corporate greed and disregard for worker welfare.
Labor unions and safety experts have long raised alarms about Amazon’s operational practices, particularly its adherence to stringent productivity metrics and rapid fulfillment expectations. Critics argue that these metrics create undue pressure on workers, leading to heightened injury risks and compromising workplace safety standards. Despite assertions from certain states and advocacy groups regarding the implementation of productivity quotas in Amazon warehouses, the company vehemently denies using such metrics, asserting its commitment to maintaining safe working environments.
According to the Senate report, the 2019 Prime Day event saw a stark statistic emerge: 45 out of every 100 warehouse workers suffered injuries. These injuries ranged from minor incidents—such as bruises and superficial cuts—to more severe conditions like concussions, which the report alleges were inconsistently reported to federal authorities as required. Amazon, however, refutes these claims, insisting that it meticulously adheres to reporting guidelines mandated by regulatory bodies like the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel strongly rebutted the Senate report’s findings, stating unequivocally that the company accurately reports all injuries that exceed basic first aid requirements. She highlighted Amazon’s cooperation with a recent six-month federal investigation, which found no evidence of deliberate or systemic misreporting of injuries. Nantel also underscored Amazon’s strides in improving safety metrics, citing a 28% reduction in recordable incidents necessitating more than basic first aid and a substantial 75% decrease in significant injuries requiring employees to miss workdays since 2019.
Responding to criticisms about staffing levels during peak periods, Amazon countered by highlighting its significant investments in safety initiatives. The company disclosed allocating over $750 million for safety enhancements in the current year alone, aiming to bolster workplace conditions and ensure adequate staffing levels during high-demand periods. Despite these efforts, concerns persist among labor advocates and lawmakers regarding Amazon’s operational strategies and their implications for worker well-being.
Amazon continues to face legal and regulatory obstacles, including fines from states like California for suspected labor law infractions, coinciding with the release of the Senate report. The discussion on corporate accountability, technology advancement, and the defense of workers’ rights in the digital age is strengthened by these advancements.
The results of regulatory investigations and legislative proposals might have a significant impact on Amazon as it works through these difficulties, as well as the larger landscape of workplace safety regulations and labor rights in the e-commerce sector. Further talks and initiatives aimed at guaranteeing safe and equitable working conditions for all Amazon employees are probably going to be fueled by the controversial topics brought up in the Senate report.
If you like the article please follow on THE UBJ.